Cases 31 - 40 of 209
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haslam v. City of Detroit et al
as 4:2022cv10652
Plaintiff:
Dorian Haslam
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Officer #2540 Daniel L Waldrep, Officer Alfred Bowlson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Clancy v. Smoes et al
as 1:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Mason Clancy
Defendant:
James Boutwell, Jon Smoes, Tyler Kempema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harville v. City of Warren et al
as 2:2022cv10154
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Harville
Defendant:
City of Warren, James Twardesky, Gregory Booton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDonald v. Dykhuizen et al
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Donta McDonald
Defendant:
Adam Robert Dykhuizen and Robert Leon Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cotton et al v. Hughes et al
as 5:2022cv10037
Plaintiff:
Marvin Cotton and Anthony Legion
Defendant:
Donald Hughes, Walter Bates, Ernest Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Townsend v. Taylor, City of et al
as 2:2022cv10019
Plaintiff:
Dijon Townsend
Defendant:
Taylor, City of, 23rd District Court, Taylor Police Department and others
Livingston v. Genesee County et al
as 4:2022cv10021
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Livingston
Defendant:
Genesee County, Brandon Szemites, Jacob Measel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv12903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mockeridge et al v. Harvey et al
as 1:2021cv12896
Plaintiff:
Michael J Mockeridge and Susan J Mockeridge
Defendant:
Harry Harvey, Alcona, County of, Carolyn Brummund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
