Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Lindell v. Pelosi et al
as 0:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Lindell
Defendant:
Nancy Pelosi, Bennie G. Thompson, Elizabeth L. Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Melillo v. City and County of Rice, The et al
as 0:2021cv02707
Plaintiff:
Keith Melillo
Defendant:
City and County of Rice, The, County and City of Faribauly Minnesota, Margaret Mee Cunniff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. City of Brooklyn Center et al
as 0:2021cv01913
Plaintiff:
Aurora Thessaly Adams
Defendant:
City of Brooklyn Center, Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dabash v. Bureau of Consular Affairs
as 0:2021cv01693
Plaintiff:
Adam Abdalla Dabash
Defendant:
Burea of Consular Affairs and Bureau of Consular Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kruse v. Elk River, City of, The et al
as 0:2021cv01262
Defendant:
Police Officer Evan Patullo, Police Officer Dale Olmscheid, Defendant Employee Samuel Hines and others
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff/Trustee Kelsey Ann Kruse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Smith v. City of Moorhead et al
as 0:2020cv02533
Defendant:
Jim Backlund, Clay County Commissioners, Barbara Achilles and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Smith, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aden v. City of Bloomington, Minnesota et al
as 0:2020cv01508
Defendant:
Officer Anthony Kiehl, Officer Adam Steir, City of Edina, Minnesota and others
Plaintiff:
Sumaya Aden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
