Cases 41 - 50 of 327
Adams v. Waite et al
as 4:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Robert C Adams
Defendant:
S Waite, Unknown Alexander, Jeffrey Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Lothrop et al
as 2:2022cv01324
Plaintiff:
Adam Smith
Defendant:
William W Lothrop, Unknown Salisbury, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ward #113886 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00998
Plaintiff:
Calvin Clinton Ward
Defendant:
David Shinn, Kenneth Herman, Adam Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tutt v. Menlove et al
as 2:2022cv00890
Plaintiff:
Roderick Citron Tutt
Defendant:
James Menlove, J Adam Shepherd, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Menlove et al
as 2:2022cv00863
Plaintiff:
James David Duncan
Defendant:
James Menlove, J Adam Shepherd and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barajos v. Gila, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
Dominic R Barajos
Defendant:
Gila, County of and J Adam Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Gila, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Anthony P Merritt
Defendant:
Gila, County of and J Adam Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Gila, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dwayne Turner
Defendant:
Gila, County of and J Adam Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bachler v. USA
as 2:2022cv00653
Petitioner:
John Adam Bachler
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stewart v. Gila, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00630
Plaintiff:
Valerie Stewart
Defendant:
Gila, County of, J Adam Shepherd, Unknown Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
