Cases 1 - 10 of 226
Hill v. Brown et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Nona Adam Brown, Joseph Angelo, Paul Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Brown et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Nona Adams Brown, Joseph Angelo, Paul Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Ross et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Maureen Nicole Adams
Defendant:
Somer Lemere Ross and GEO - ATEF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Altamirano v. Moon et al
as 2:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
Adam Tamaz Cecilio Altamirano
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Moon, Sergeant Self, Correction Officer Gaddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Murray et al
as 4:2023cv01471
Plaintiff:
Stephen Earl Adams
Defendant:
Billy J Murray, Greg Walker, Lonzo Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Kitchens et al
as 4:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
Stephen Earl Adams
Defendant:
John Kitchens and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burt v. Ortiz et al
as 4:2023cv01167
Plaintiff:
Naquita Burt
Defendant:
Ortiz, Riddle, Phil Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wertz v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01143
Petitioner:
Marcus Adam Wertz
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sales v. Smith et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Gerber Sales
Defendant:
Officer Smith, Officer Whittley, Officer Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeton v. Dunlap et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant:
Officer Dunlap, Officer Whittley and Officer Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
