Cases 1 - 10 of 5,011
Manning v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Adam J. Manning
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Friedman v. USHealth Advisors, LLC
as 0:2024cv61050
Plaintiff:
Adam Friedman
Defendant:
USHealth Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Navarro v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., A Liberian Corporation
as 1:2024cv22289
Plaintiff:
Dana Adam Navarro
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., A Liberian Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
ALLEN v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
SHER'MON A ALLEN
Defendant:
ADAM SUTTON, R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUNSDORF v. PENSACOLA FPC
as 3:2024cv00242
Petitioner:
ADAM P RUNSDORF
Respondent:
PENSACOLA FPC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ARASTEH v. LUXURBAN HOTELS INC.
as 1:2024cv21987
Plaintiff:
ADAM ARASTEH
Defendant:
LUXURBAN HOTELS INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ARASTEH v. LUXURBAN HOTELS INC. et al
as 1:2024cv21990
Plaintiff:
ADAM ARASTEH
Defendant:
LUXURBAN HOTELS INC. and TOWNHOUSE HOTEL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hale v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00533
Petitioner:
Adam Hale
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Balint et al v. Osceola County, Florida
as 6:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
Robert Balint, Brandon Bowling, Brian Carroll and others
Defendant:
Osceola County, Florida
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PRUDHOMME v. MICHLES et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
ADAM J PRUDHOMME
Defendant:
MARCUS MICHLES, RAINEY BOOTH, ADRIAN BRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
