Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Adib Makdessi v. Bryan Watson
as 23-6573
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI, a/k/a Eddie Makdessi
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN WATSON, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison
Makdessi v. Collins et al
as 7:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Defendant:
Collins, S.T. White, Asst. Warden Blevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Makdessi v. Collins et al
as 7:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Defendant:
Larry Collins and G. Ridings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Makdessi v. Collins et al
as 7:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Defendant:
Collins, Lt. Masengill, Asst. Warden Blevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Makdessi v. Fox et al
as 7:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Defendant:
Dr. Fox, Nurse Jessee, Warden White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Makdessi v. Collins et al
as 7:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Defendant:
Collins, Warden Kiser and Warden White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Makdessi v. King
as 7:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Fuller and Major King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Makdessi v. Fox et al
as 7:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Defendant:
Dr. Fox, Nurse Bledsoe, Nurse Trent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Makdessi v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, David Robinson, Jeffrey Kiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adib Makdessi v. Bryan Watson
as 22-6397
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI, a/k/a Eddie Makdessi
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN WATSON, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
