Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MLB Sales Incorporated v. RK Gems LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01526
Plaintiff:
MLB Sales Incorporated an Arizona corporation doing business as Inventory Adjusters Incorporated
Defendant:
RK Gems LLC and Pruthvi Belavadi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ammons v. Diversified Adjustment Service Incorporated
as 2:2019mc00013
Petitioner:
Thompson Consumer Law Group PLLC
Defendant:
Diversified Adjustment Service Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Michele Ammons
Spirits LP v. Maricopa, County of, et. al.
as 2:2018cv04364
Defendant:
Maricopa County Board of Adjustment, Unknown Parties and Maricopa, County of
Plaintiff:
Spirits LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Vasbinder et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2018cv03440
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Worship Center Incorporated and Jordan Vasbinder
Defendant:
Phoenix Board of Adjustment and Phoenix, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
