Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Task Force BPO, LLC v. AVA Consulting et al
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Task Force BPO, LLC
Defendant:
AVA Consulting, LLC d/b/a Adjusters Virtual Assistants and/or AVA, Remko Bloemhard and AVA Consulting, LLC doing business as Adjusters Virtual Assistants doing business as AVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00712
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brown et al v. Hanover American Insurance Company, Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv02415
Defendant:
Hanover American Insurance Company, Inc., Goodman-Gable-Gould Adjuster/International, Inc.,, Coastal Technical Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Mott, Tatooed Millionaire Entertainment, LLC and Christopher Calib Brown
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Clearview Residences, LLC et al v. Memphis and Shelby County Board of Adjustment
as 2:2020cv02117
Plaintiff:
Charles Richardson, Jr., Clearview Residences, LLC, Peggy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Memphis and Shelby County Board of Adjustment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ricciardone v. National Credit Adjusters, LLC
as 3:2019cv00483
Defendant:
National Credit Adjusters, LLC
Plaintiff:
Brandi Ricciardone
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00191
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
