Cases 1 - 10 of 52
H&E Equipment Services, Inc v. Adkins
as 4:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
H&E Equipment Services, Inc
Defendant:
Brian Adkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FP Riverdale LLC et al v. Adkins
as 1:2023cv04173
Plaintiff:
FP Riverdale LLC and Faros Property Management LLC
Defendant:
Thelis Adkins and and all others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Osowa v. Randazzo et al
as 2:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Alexander Osowa
Defendant:
Receiver Joe Randazzo and Judge Tamela Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Osowa v. Randazzo et al
as 1:2022cv04433
Plaintiff:
Alexander Osowa
Defendant:
Receiver Joe Randazzo and Judge Tamela Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Osawa v. Adkins et al
as 1:2022cv03970
Plaintiff:
Alexander E. Osawa
Defendant:
Tamela Adkins, Joe Randazzo, Chief Justice of Gwinnett County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luo et al v. Adkins
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Anfei Luo, Jennifer A., Natalie A. and others
Defendant:
Bill William Scott Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adkins v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02216
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Randall Adkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Williamson et al
as 3:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Mr. Horne, Cpt. Faison, Ms. Harold and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. HLA Over Georgia, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00022
Defendant:
HLA Over Georgia, LLC, Precious Yemi and Daniel Adkins
Plaintiff:
Samantha Griffin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Tired of Mining, LLC v. Gann et al
as 1:2020cv01467
Defendant:
Scott Gann, Iron City, LLC and Jason B. Adkins
Plaintiff:
Tired of Mining, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
