Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 35
MEREDITH'S INC., D/B/A SAVERSYSTEMS, AS SPONSOR OF THE SAVERSYSTEMS EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN et al v. MILLER et al
as 1:2023cv01877
Plaintiff: MEREDITH'S INC., D/B/A SAVERSYSTEMS, AS SPONSOR OF THE SAVERSYSTEMS EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN and SAVERSYSTEMS EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNSERSHIP PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR
Defendant: MICHAEL S. MILLER, JOHN MEREDITH and DAVID BARNES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, et al. v. MILLER et al
as 1:2022cv02123
Plaintiff: ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR OF THE PRUDENTIAL MERGED RETIREMENT PLAN and THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE and PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant: DENNIS E MILLER, ESTATE OF ELIZABETH M. MILLER, THOMAS B GOSSETT and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
COOK v. PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES LOCAL UNION 197 OF TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA MONEY PENSION PLAN BOARD OF TRUSTEES AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE PLAN et al
as 2:2022cv00291
Plaintiff: APRIL COOK
Defendant: PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES LOCAL UNION 197 OF TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA MONEY PENSION PLAN BOARD OF TRUSTEES AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE PLAN and PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES LOCAL UNION 197 OF TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA MONEY PENSION PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
NASH v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv02167
Plaintiff: KELLI NASH
Defendant: GGNSC ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES LLC PLAN and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
v. NYU GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE RETIREMENT PLAN FOR MEMBERS OF THE FACULTY, PROFESSIONAL RESEARCH STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv09087
Trustee: BETH BERANBAUM and MICHAEL BERANBAUM
Defendant: TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (TIAA), NEW YORK UNIVERSITY AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR OF SAID PLAN, JOHN DOES 1-10 (FICTITIOUS AND UNKNOWN TO PLAINTIFFS AT THIS TIME), INDIVIDUALLY OR AS CORPORATE ENTITIES and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Brenda Garland v. The Snap-On Incorporated, et al
as 21-10983
Defendant / Appellee: SNAP-ON INCORPORATED, SNAP-ON TOOLS COMPANY, LLC, SIOUX TOOLS COMPONENT, and it's Administrator, The Retirement Plan Committee appointed by the Board of Directors of Snap-On Incorporated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRENDA GARLAND
Vicki Michael v. ConAgra Brands Inc Pension, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-36030
Defendant / Appellee: CONAGRA BRANDS APPEALS COMMITTEE, AKA Appeals Committee, CONAGRA BRANDS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, the Plan Administrator, AKA Administrative Commitee and CONAGRA BRANDS INC PENSION PLAN FOR HOURLY PRODUCTION WORKERS, an employee pension benefit Plan, AKA Pension Plan
Defendant: DOES, I-XX; individual members of the Plan administrative and/or appeals committees
Plaintiff / Appellant: VICKI MICHAEL, individually and as representative on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons
Solomon v. Time Warner Pension Plan et al
as 1:2017cv01831
Plaintiff: Beth Solomon
Defendant: Time Warner Pension Plan and Administrative Committee (Pension Plan)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Munnelly v. Fordham University Faculty and Administration HMO Insurance Plan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv05632
Defendant: Fordham University Faculty and Administration HMO Insurance Plan, Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc. and UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company of New York
Plaintiff: Kevin Munnelly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hoak et al v. Ledford et al
as 1:2015cv03983
Plaintiff: Jon Hoak , Anthony Fano and Allan Quick
Defendant: Andrea Ledford , Compensation and Human Resource Committee of NCR Corporation Board of Directors , NCR Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?