Cases 1 - 10 of 191
USA v. Adrian Moon
as 23-5240
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Adrian Damico Moon, GBN Chosen One
BOWRIN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv02421
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN BOWRIN
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MICHAEL VILLANCOURT and CURT SLOAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
TURNER v. PESNELL et al
as 1:2023cv02364
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE TURNER
Defendant:
ADRIAN PESNELL and USSOCOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MOON
as 1:2023cv01972
Counter Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Counter Claimant:
ADRIAN DAMICO MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
GLASGOW v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2021cv00888
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CONSULATE, ACCRA, GHANA and others
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN ULISA GLASGOW
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
THOMPSON v. LOGAN et al
as 1:2020cv02293
Defendant:
CURTIS SLOAN, QASIM THOMAS, CASEY LOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAITT et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2020cv01557
Plaintiff:
MARLON CARTER, LYNELL COOPER, PAUL GRAHAM and others
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, THE REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, REPUBLIC OF SUDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
