Cases 1 - 9 of 9
GUILLE v. THE MONTANA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE et al
as 6:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Adrian Guille
Respondent:
The Montana Board Of Pardons And Parole, The Chief Of Staff For The Montana State Board Of Pardons And Parole, The Attorney General Of The State Of New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2023cv00049
Petitioner:
Brennan Adrian Jones
Respondent:
Lake County Montana, Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McElderry v. Lake County
as 9:2023cv00046
Petitioner:
Adrian M. McElderry
Respondent:
Lake County, James Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lake County Montana et al
as 9:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Brennan Adrian Jones
Defendant:
Lake County Montana, Bill Barron, Steve Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElderry v. Lake County Montana et al
as 9:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Adrian McElderry
Defendant:
Lake County Montana, Bill Barron, Steve Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Roe
as 9:2017cv00096
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Adrian Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guille v. Beeson et al
as 6:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Adrian Guille
Defendant:
Myron Beeson, Leroy Kirkegard, Sam Jovanovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guille v. Sweeney et al
as 6:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Adrian Guille
Defendant:
Josh Sweeney, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Adrian Francis Perez
Defendant:
T. Green, Mike Ferriter, Patrick Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
