Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Requena v. Sheridan, et al
as 17-3096
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN M. REQUENA
Defendant - Appellee:
G. SHERIDAN, CCII Unit Team, in his individual and official capacity, A. FLORY, Librarian, in her individual and official capacity, D. LANGFORD, Deputy Warden, in his individual and official capacity and others
Requena v. Roberts, et al
as 17-3041
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN M. REQUENA
Respondent - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS and DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Requena v. Roberts, et al
as 17-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN M. REQUENA
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, SAM CLINE, BERRY LARSON and others
Requena v. Roberts, et al
as 16-3047
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN M. REQUENA
Respondent - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, SAM CLINE and DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Requena (ID 48877) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2015cv03077
Petitioner:
Adrian M. Requena
Respondent:
Ray Roberts and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Requena (ID 48877) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2014cv03039
Petitioner:
Adrian M. Requena
Respondent:
Ray Roberts, Sam Cline and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Requena v. Roberts, et al
as 13-3312
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN M. REQUENA
Respondent - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS and DEREK SCHMIDT, Kansas Attorney General
Requena (ID 48877) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2013cv03186
Petitioner:
Adrian M. Requena
Respondent:
Ray Roberts and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Requena (ID 48877) v. Roberts et al
as 5:2013cv03043
Plaintiff:
Adrian M. Requena
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Sam Cline, Berry Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Requena v. Roberts, et al
as 07-3282
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADRIAN M. REQUENA
Respondent - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
