Cases 21 - 30 of 42
RTC Industries, Inc. v. Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
as 1:2014cv09722
Plaintiff:
RTC Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
RAMOS v. EVENTUS MARKETING, LLC. et al
as 1:2014cv24345
Plaintiff:
JANIS RAMOS
Defendant:
EVENTUS MARKETING, LLC. and ADVANTAGE SALES & MARKETING, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
as 5:2014cv00505
Plaintiff:
Jay Dee Scott
Defendant:
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC v. Lois Marks
as 8:2013cv01664
Plaintiff:
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
Defendant:
Lois Marks
AFM Food Service Corporation v. Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv05695
Plaintiff:
AFM Food Service Corporation
Defendant:
Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC and Advantage Waypoint, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC v. Promo Works LLC
as 8:2013cv01506
Plaintiff:
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
Defendant:
Promo Works LLC
GONZALEZ v. ADVANTAGE SALES & MARKETING LLC
as 1:2013cv03627
Plaintiff:
OSCAR GONZALEZ
Defendant:
ADVANTAGE SALES & MARKETING LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Stone v. Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
as 5:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Beth Stone
Defendant:
Advantage Sales & Marketing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mrozik v. Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC
as 6:2012cv01437
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Mrozik
Defendant:
Advantage Sales & Marketing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
