Cases 1 - 10 of 27
ESTATE OF AVRAHAM SASI et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF AVRAHAM SASI, TERRI PETERSON, TRUDI DAUB and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
InstaMortgage f/k/a Arcus Lending, Inc. v. Lozoya et al
as 5:2022cv03006
Plaintiff:
InstaMortgage f/k/a Arcus Lending, Inc.
Defendant:
Michelle Lozoya and AHL Funding
Uju Onuachi v. Master Builders Inc., et al
as 19-1196
Defendant / Appellee:
Heart Consultants, PC, John R. Timmermier, John K. Green and others
Defendant:
Timmermier, Gross, & Prentiss Law Firm, Pansing, Hogan Law Firm, Wolfe, Snowden, Hurd & Ahl, L.L.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Uju Onuachi
Ahl v. LivaNova Deutschland gmbH et al
as CO/1:18-cv-01306
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ahl and Elizabeth (I) Ahl
Defendant:
LIVANOVA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH and LivaNova Holding USA, Inc.
The New York State Court Offic v. Hite
as 12-1243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
New York State Court Officers Association, on its own behalf and on behalf of its current and retired members and their dependents
Defendant - Appellee:
Patricia A. Hite, in her official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Civil Service, Caroline W. Ahl, In their official capacities as Commissioners of the New York State Civil Service Commission, J. Dennis Hanrahan, in their official capacities as Commissioner of the New York State Civil Service Commission and others
The New York State Court Officers Association v. Hite et al
as 1:2012cv00532
Plaintiff:
The New York State Court Officers Association
Defendant:
Patricia A. Hite , Caroline W. Ahl , J. Dennis Hanrahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
The New York State Court Officers Association v. Hite et al
as 1:2012cv00470
Plaintiff:
The New York State Court Officers Association
Defendant:
Patricia A. Hite , Caroline W. Ahl , J. Dennis Hanrahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
