Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Curtis v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Ryan Curtis
Defendant:
Lackawanna County, Wellpath, LLC, Nelson Anthony Iannuzzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: GAD
as 2:2023cv02135
Plaintiff:
AHMED F. GAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01596
Lead Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mohaisen v. Conlin et al
as 1:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Saddam Mohaisen
Defendant:
James Joseph Conlin and Schneider National Carriers Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor In Possession:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
GAD v. RIVERA et al
as 2:2022cv04393
Plaintiff:
AHMED FEISAL GAD
Defendant:
SEARGENT RIVERA, DEPUTY BRADLEY, SECURITY OFFICERS WHO SEARCHED MY CELLL 2033 AT D BLOCK ON JULY 16/2022 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YAROW
as 5:2022cv04089
Plaintiff:
IN RE: AHMED I. YAROW
Defendant:
JACOB R. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
