Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wild Virginia v. Council on Environmental Quality
as 21-1839
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILD VIRGINIA, VIRGINIA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE, UPSTATE FOREVER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and MARY NEUMAYR, in her official capacity as Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FUEL AND PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Wild Virginia et al v. Council on Environmental Quality et al
as 3:2020cv00045
Plaintiff:
Mountaintrue, Alliance for the Shenandoah Valley, The Clinch Coalition and others
Defendant:
Mary Neumayr and Council on Environmental Quality
Intervenor Defendant:
American Petroleum Institute, Federal Forest Resource Council, National Cattlemen's Beef Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
Southern Ute Indian Tribe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Cahaba Riverkeeper, et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection, et al
as 17-11972
Petitioner:
CAHABA RIVERKEEPER, CHOCTAWHATCHEE RIVERKEEPER, INC., FRIENDS OF HURRICANE CREEK and others
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, SCOTT PRUITT and V. ANNE HEARD
American Rivers, et al v. FERC, et al
as 16-1336
Petitioner:
American Rivers and Alabama Rivers Alliance
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States Secretary of the Interior
American Rivers, et al v. FERC, et al
as 16-1195
Petitioner:
American Rivers and Alabama Rivers Alliance
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States Secretary of the Interior
Alabama Rivers Alliance, Inc. et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 5:2007cv01609
Plaintiff:
Alabama Rivers Alliance, Inc., Alabama Rivers Alliance, Inc., Alabama Rivers Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Peter Geren, Robert L Van Antwerp and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
SE Fed Power Cust v. Harvey, Francis J., et al
as 06-5080
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Southeastern Federal Power Customers, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Army, Joseph W. Westphal, in his official capacity as the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Robert B. Flowers, Lt. General in his official capacity as the Commander, United States Army Corp of Engineers and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
City of Gainsville, State of Georgia, Cobb County Marietta Water Authority and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
State of Florida
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
American Public Power Association and National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Alabama Rivers Alliance, Apalachicola Bay & Riverkeeper, Inc., Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. and others
SE Fed Power Cust v. Caldera (St of FL), et al
as 04-5143
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Southeastern Federal Power Customers, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Louis Caldera, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army, Joseph W. Westphal, in his official capacity as the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Robert B. Flowers, Lt. General in his official capacity as the Commander, United States Army Corp of Engineers and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
City of Gainsville, State of Georgia, Cobb County Marietta Water Authority and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
State of Florida
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
American Public Power Association and National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Alabama Rivers Alliance, Apalachicola Bay & Riverkeeper, Inc., Chattahoochee Riverkeeper and others
AL Riv Alli, et al v. FERC
as 01-1408
Petitioner:
Alabama Rivers Alliance, American Rivers Inc. and Lake Watch of Lake Martin
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Alabama Power Company
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
National Hydropower Association and Edison Electric Institute
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
State of Washington, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
