Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Young v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Mario Tavarous Young
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramsey v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Frederico Ramsey
Defendant:
Alan Cohen and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramos-Ramos v. Cohen (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramos-Ramos and Pedro J. Ramos-Ramos
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baggott v. Cohen (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Robert Baggott
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coleman v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lamar Coleman
Defendant:
Alan Cohen and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burnette v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Burnette
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Neal v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Chester L. Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilkerson v. Cohen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Cardarius Wilkerson
Defendant:
Alan Cohen, FPC Montgomery and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mahbubani v. Cohen (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Rajesh Mahbubani
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mays v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Chapman Rogers Mays
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
