Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
STUDY v. MEYER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00101
Plaintiff: JOHN STUDY
Defendant: TODD J. MEYER, KEN CAMPBELL, MATTHEW C. KINCAID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STUDY v. MEYER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00364
Plaintiff: JOHN STUDY
Defendant: TODD MEYER, KEN CAMPBELL, MATTHEW KINCAID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nugent v. Pippin
as 0:2012cv61881
Plaintiff: Clint Nugent
Defendant: Alan Pippin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
METZ v. PIPPEN et al
as 8:2012cv01634
Petitioner: Dennis Metz
Respondent: Alan Pippin, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Jennifer Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SIMMONS v. PIPPIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00358
Petitioner: BYRON L SIMMONS
Respondent: ALAN PIPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowen v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00426
Petitioner: Thomas Leroy Bowen
Respondent: Secretary Department of Corrections, Rick Scott, Alan Pippin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Valdez v. Pippin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00127
Petitioner: Leroy Trevino Valdez
Respondent: Alan Pippin and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ENNO v. PIPPIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00085
Petitioner: KIRK G ENNO
Respondent: ALAN PIPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STUDY v. PIPPIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00029
Respondent: ALAN PIPPIN
Petitioner: JOHN ORVILLE STUDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STUDY v. PIPPIN
as 3:2011cv00537
Petitioner: JOHN ORVILLE STUDY
Respondent: ALAN PIPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?