Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Albert Mills v. Wes Moore
as 23-6530
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT CURTIS MILLS
Defendant / Appellee:
WES MOORE
Mills v. Beitzel et al
as 1:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Lauren A. Beitzel, April Carr, Vaughn Whiteman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Meter et al
as 1:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
M. Van Meter, Melissa Brashear Hayy, Sergeant J. Uphole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Carr et al
as 1:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
April Carr, Lauren A. Beitzel, Vaughn Whiteman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Moore
as 1:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Wes Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Jeff Nines, Warden et al
as 1:2022cv03304
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Jeff Nines, Warden, Keith Arnold, Assistant Warden, Ronald Stotler, Chief of Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Lauren Beitzel et al
as 1:2022cv02805
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Lauren Beitzel, Vaughn Whiteman, Lieutenant, John G. Sindy, Case Management Specialist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Roderick et al
as 1:2022cv02452
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
R. Roderick, W. Hill, F. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Iser et al
as 1:2022cv01691
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Major W. Iser, Lt. Thomas, Commissioner O. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Farris et al
as 1:2022cv01640
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Jamie Farris and C. Gilpin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
