Cases 11 - 20 of 197
Thomas v. City of Bay City Texas et al
as 3:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
Makeba D Thomas
Defendant:
City of Bay City Texas, Bay City Police Dept, Charles Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2008cv00634
Petitioner:
RENARD DEWAYNE SMITH
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Harley Lappin and Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Browne v. Gonzales, et al
as 08-30571
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERIC D BROWNE
Respondent - Appellee:
ALBERTO GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MICHAEL GARCIA and others
Badillo-Rangel v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al
as 1:2008cv00452
Plaintiff:
Raul Badillo-Rangel
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Immigration & Naturalization, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tercero v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2008cv00020
Plaintiff:
Roque Aranda Tercero
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Danny C. Dominguez and Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles Agency Members
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Van v. Gonzales et al
as 9:2008cv00078
Petitioner:
Nguyen Tuan Van
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Marcy Foreman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tran v. Gonzales et al
as 9:2008cv00067
Petitioner:
Son Thanh Tran
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Marcy Forman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2008cv00125
Petitioner:
Anthony . Brian Martin
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Martin v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2008cv00198
Petitioner:
Anthony . Brian Martin
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HINOJOSA v. GONZALES et al
as 7:2008cv00096
Plaintiff:
CARLOS JORGE HINOJOSA
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, MICHEAL T. SHELBY, HILDA TAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
