Cases 11 - 20 of 438
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv08292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Margaret Elizabeth Broderick et al v. Alberto Gonzales et al
as 2:2008cv02538
Defendant:
Tereser A Banks, Tereser A Banks, L Block and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Elizabeth Broderick and Roe Rayborn
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Liao v. Ashcroft et al
as 3:2008cv02776
Plaintiff:
Wanxia Liao
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Alberto Gonzales, Kevin Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00780
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kabil v. Chertoff, et al
as 2:2008cv00310
Plaintiff:
Talat Mohamed Kabil
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, Michael Makasey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahvesh Shakir v. Michael Chertoff et al
as 2:2008cv00754
Plaintiff:
Mahvesh Shakir
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales, Jane Arellano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Bermudez v. Gonzales
as 1:2007cv01831
Petitioner:
Jesus Valdez Bermudez
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01315
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Yao-Stilwill v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv05909
Plaintiff:
Jie Yao-Stilwill
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
