Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01111
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicu:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1252
Luna v. Gonzales
as 9:2010cv01111
Petitioner:
Worklis Luna
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
Amicu:
Gelernt Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sirleaf v. Smith et al
as 9:2007cv01124
Petitioner:
Abraham Sirleaf
Respondent:
Major Smith, Peter J. Smith and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKay v. Smith et al
as 9:2007cv01081
Petitioner:
Dennis G. McKay, Jr.
Respondent:
Major Smith, Peter J. Smith and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McClatchie v. Gonzales
as 9:2007cv00918
Petitioner:
Fitzgerald McClatchie
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mehdi v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00729
Plaintiff:
Musehtaba Mehdi
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Eduardo Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ragland v. U.S. Congress et al
as 5:2007cv00718
Plaintiff:
Kim Ragland
Defendant:
U.S. Congress, New York State Legislatures, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Alexis v. Gonzales et al
as 9:2007cv00620
Petitioner:
Bayne Alexis
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and James L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
