Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sims v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05691
Plaintiff:
Tiwon S. Sims
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Officer Brandon Neita-Scott, Star No. 18908 and Officer Victor Alcazar, Star No. 11046
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ames et al v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv00729
Plaintiff:
Jerome Ames and Tony Vann
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Victor Alcazar (#11046), Brandon Neita-Scott (#18908) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McFarthing v. Colone et al
as 1:2019cv00777
Defendant:
Norwood, Carter, Abuteen and others
Plaintiff:
Phalyon L McFarthing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Alcazar v. Halvorsen
as 1:2012cv08209
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Alcazar
Defendant:
Brenda Halvorsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Smith v. Northwestern Memorial Healthcare et al
as 1:2011cv05890
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Smith
Defendant:
Northwestern Memorial Healthcare, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern Memorial Physicians Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mercado v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv06177
Plaintiff:
Jose Mercado
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David Alcazar and Christopher Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv05246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
