Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Alden Alexander Thomas Sr. v. Gigi Matterson et al
as 2:2023cv01268
Petitioner:
Alden Alexander Thomas, Sr.
Respondent:
Gigi Matterson and V. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alden Alexander Thomas, Sr. v. Giselle Matteson
as 2:2021cv03767
Petitioner:
Alden Alexander Thomas, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16450
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALDEN ANTHONY THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alden A. Thomas Sr. v. Kamala D. Harris et al
as 2:2018mc00032
Respondent:
Judge Scott D. Daniels, Kamala D. Harris and Donna Wolin
Petitioner:
Alden A. Thomas, Sr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00784
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabiliation et al
as 1:2018cv00192
Plaintiff:
Alden A. Thomas
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabiliation and Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALDEN THOMAS, SR. v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION AND REHABILITATION, et al
as 2:2018mc00035
Plaintiff:
ALDEN A. THOMAS, SR.
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION AND REHABILITATION and RAYMOND MADDEN
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
Thomas v. California Department of Correction and Rehailitation
as 3:2018cv00152
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehailitation
Plaintiff:
Alden A. Thomas, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Superior Court of California, Imperial County
as 2:2017cv02408
Petitioner:
Alden A. Thomas
Respondent:
Superior Court of California, Imperial County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
