Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
State of Tennessee v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Department of Homeland Security, Patrick Lechleitner and others
Interested Party:
Attorney General Merrick Garland and U.S. Attorney Henry C. Leventis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Albarrakee v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Basim Neamah Albarrakee
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Merrick B Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02446
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
