Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Livell Figgs v. Alex Dawson, et al
as 15-2926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIVELL FIGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEX DAWSON, Warden, in his personal capacity, AUSTIN RANDOLPH, Warden, in his personal capacity, LORI FISHEL, in her personal capacity and others
Figgs et al v. Dawson et al
as 3:2013cv03218
Plaintiff:
Livell Figgs
Defendant:
Alex Dawson , Austin S Randolph, Jr , Lori Fishel and others
Respondent:
John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Randolph et al
as 3:2013cv03219
Plaintiff:
Leo Thomas
Defendant:
- Randolph, Alex Dawson, Kevin Standley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shehadeh v. Godinez et al
as 3:2013cv03103
Plaintiff:
Jamal Shehadeh
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, John Nunley, Yolande Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Figgs et al v. Dawson et al
as 1:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Livell Figgs
Defendant:
Alex Dawson, Austin S. Randolph, Jr., Lori Fishel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Standley et al
as 3:2012cv03242
Plaintiff:
Edward Jordan
Defendant:
Kevin Standley, Alex Dawson, Raymon Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sercye v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 3:2012cv03220
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sercye
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Jennifer Weatherford, Doctor Obaisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Illinois Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv03869
Plaintiff:
Lance Eugene Hall
Defendant:
Illinois Dept. of Corrections, Salvatore Godinez, Alex Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontano v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv03042
Plaintiff:
James Fontano
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Alex Dawson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sprinkle v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00288
Petitioner:
Billy Sprinkle
Respondent:
Illinois Department Of Corrections and Alex Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
