Cases 1 - 10 of 297
Kaweah Delta Health Care District, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-55209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAWEAH DELTA HEALTH CARE DISTRICT, DBA Kaweah Delta Medical Center, ANTELOPE VALLEY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, DBA Antelope Valley Hospital, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX M. AZAR II, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and XAVIER BECERRA, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity
Kaweah Delta Health Care District, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 23-55157
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAWEAH DELTA HEALTH CARE DISTRICT, DBA Kaweah Delta Medical Center, ANTELOPE VALLEY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, DBA Antelope Valley Hospital, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity
NATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv00131
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, NORRIS COCHRAN and XAVIER BECERRA
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, TYSON DRUGS, INC. doing business as TYSON DRUG CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2020cv03485
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP HOSPITAL DISTRICT doing business as WASHINGTON HOSPITAL, COUNTY OF KERN doing business as KERN MEDICAL CENTER, DIGNITY HEALTH doing business as ST. MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, XAVIER BECERRA and NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv01150
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II and HOUSTON METHODIST WEST HOSPITAL
Plaintiff:
HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL, HOUSTON METHODIST BAYTOWN HOSPITAL, HOUSTON METHODIST SUGARLAND HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
HOSPITAL DR. CAYETANO COLL Y TOSTE et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv03298
Plaintiff:
HOSPITAL PAVIA HATO REY, INC., KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS doing business as KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL - SOUTH SACRAMENTO, HOSPITAL DR. PEREA and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01097
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., WELLINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, MCALLEN HOSPITALS, LP and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
NATIONAL CONSUMER VOICE FOR QUALITY LONG-TERM CARE et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2021cv00162
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALEX M. AZAR, II, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA ADVOCATES FOR NURSING HOME REFORM and NATIONAL CONSUMER VOICE FOR QUALITY LONG-TERM CARE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
WEST FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. et al v. AZAR
as 1:2021cv00004
Plaintiff:
COLUMBIA PLAZA MEDICAL CENTER OF FORT WORTH SUBSIDIARY, L.P. doing business as MEDICAL CITY FORT WORTH formerly known as PLAZA MEDICAL CENTER OF FORT WORTH, COLUMBIA HOSPITAL AT MEDICAL CITY DALLAS SUBSIDIARY, L.P. doing business as MEDICAL CITY DALLAS, COLISEUM MEDICAL CENTER, LLC doing business as COLISEUM MEDICAL CENTERS and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II and NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
POMONA VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR
as 1:2021cv00048
Plaintiff:
PRESBYTERIAN INTERCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC. doing business as PIH HEALTH HOSPITAL - WHITTIER also known as PRESBYTERIAN INTERCOMMUNITY - WHITTIER, PRESBYTERIAN INTERCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC. doing business as PIH HEALTH HOSPITAL - DOWNEY also known as DOWNEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER also known as DOWNEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, DOWNEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II and NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
