Cases 1 - 10 of 166
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01144
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Foy v. Kunzweiler et al
as 4:2024cv00499
Defendant:
Sharon Holmes, Tim Buckner, Charles Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Clint Patrick Foy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ray v. Quick
as 5:2024cv00867
Petitioner:
Raymond Alexander Ray
Respondent:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hutchins v. Gourley et al
as 5:2024cv00852
Defendant:
Alexander Ocosta, Wade Gourley and City of Oklahoma City Police Department
Plaintiff:
Dexter Hutchins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00587
Defendant:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Saantyya Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Evans v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Raymond C Evans
Defendant:
FNU Walker
Respondent:
Grady County Jail, Jim Gorlach, FNU Cade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hoosier v. Musk
as 4:2024cv00232
Defendant:
Elon Reeve Musk
Plaintiff:
Kaleb Alexander Hoosier
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Loggins v. Huffman et al
as 6:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Loggins and Tony
Defendant:
J. Huffman, C. Kirkland, Unknown Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weinert v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Steven Alexander Weinert
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
