Cases 61 - 70 of 264
JOHNSON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
VANIHEL, HENDERSON, HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Wright et al
as 3:2021cv00965
Plaintiff:
Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander
Defendant:
Wright, Scott Ruszowski, Bill Redman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02762
Plaintiff:
AUDREY RENEE ALEXANDER
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Rutledge v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00389
Plaintiff:
Alexander Harris Rutledge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Warnstaff v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00752
Plaintiff:
Alexander M. Warnstaff
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CONNOR v. BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2021cv02583
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ALEXANDER CONNOR
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALTERS v. USA
as 1:2021cv02433
Petitioner:
LEVI ALEXANDER WALTERS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BEALS v. CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 4:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
WARREN ALEXANDER BEALS
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIUS DEONTE ALEXANDER
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, EDWARDS, ETHRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACEVEDO v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
