Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
O. v. Enloe Medical Center-Esplanade et al
as 2:2021cv00844
Defendant:
Enloe Medical Center, Akiba E. Green and Enloe Medical Center-Esplanade
Plaintiff:
Francis Ocasio, A. Y. O. and Alexander Ocasio
Petitioner:
Rite Aid Corporation and Optum, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
O. v. Enloe Medical Center-Esplanade et al
as 2:2021at00427
Defendant:
Optum, Inc., Enloe Medical Center-Esplanade and Rite Aid Corporation
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ocasio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Alexander Ocasio v. Bradley Gruner, et al
as 17-17564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER OCASIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRADLEY GRUNER, Dr., COREY GRIBBIN, DEBRAH TANNER and others
Alexander Ocasio v. Bradley Gruner, et al
as 17-15741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER OCASIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRADLEY GRUNER, Dr., COREY GRIBBIN, DEBRAH TANNER and others
Ocasio v. Perez et al
as 2:2016cv00956
Defendant:
Gribon, Dr. Bradley Gruner and Perez
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ocasio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ocasio v. Stubbs et al
as 2:2011cv01131
Defendant:
Jerry Bainbridge and Thomas Stubbs
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ocasio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ocasio v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2009cv00539
Petitioner:
Alexander Ocasio
Respondent:
E. K. McDaniel and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ocasio v. Saunders et al
as 3:2009cv00400
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ocasio
Defendant:
Saunders, Smit, Horman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander Ocasio v. E. McDaniel, et al
as 09-16331
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALEXANDER OCASIO
Respondent - Appellee:
E.K. MCDANIEL, Warden and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
