Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jones v. Wang et al
as 2:2023cv01299
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Alexander Wang and Versace
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Versace et al
as 2:2023cv01298
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Versace, Alexander Wang, Vivian Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jangle Vision, LLC v. Alexander Wang, Inc., et al
as 22-55642
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANGLE VISION, LLC, a California limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEXANDER WANG, INC., a Delaware Corporation and ALEXANDER WANG, an individual
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Jangle Vision, LLC v. Alexander Wang Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv09964
Plaintiff:
Jangle Vision, LLC
Defendant:
Alexander Wang Incorporated, Alexander Wang and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jangle Vision, LLC v. Alexander Wang Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv06627
Plaintiff:
Jangle Vision, LLC
Defendant:
Alexander Wang Incorporated, Alexander Wang and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ramales v. Alexander Wang Incorporated
as 1:2020cv00926
Plaintiff:
Felipe Ramales
Defendant:
Alexander Wang Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Barbera v. Alexander Wang Incorporated
as 1:2019cv07540
Defendant:
Alexander Wang Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Robert Barbera
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
