Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv07982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Guerra v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00852
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Guerra
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0402
Luis Guerra-Mejia v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-74017
Petitioner:
LUIS ALFREDO GUERRA-MEJIA
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Lopez et al v. Marecki Masonry, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10509
Plaintiff:
Juan Lopez , Raul Lopez and Alfredo Guerra
Defendant:
Marecki Masonry, Inc. and Marek Micek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Guerra et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 7:2014cv00376
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Guerra and Irma Guerra
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guerra-Delgado, et al v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, et al
as 13-2065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFREDO GUERRA-DELGADO and BELINDA BLANCH BERRIOS
Defendant - Appellee:
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, BANCO POPULAR NORTH AMERICA, INC., PLAN DE RETIRO DE BANCO POPULAR and others
Defendant:
POPULAR, INC.
Guerra v. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
as 1:2013cv22070
Defendant:
Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Guerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Guerra Delgado et al v. Popular Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01535
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Guerra Delgado , Belinda Blanch Berrios and Conjugal partnership Guerra-Blanch
Defendant:
Popular Inc., Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, Banco Popular North America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00049
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01104
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
