Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gilbert v. Retail Property Trust et al
as 1:2022cv01228
Defendant:
Allied Universal, Retail Property Trust and Allied Universal Corp.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gilbert v. Retail Property Trust et al
as 3:2021cv01566
Defendant:
Allied Universal, Retail Property Trust and Allied Universal Corp
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bouvier v. City of Covington, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04597
Defendant:
Allied Universal Corp., City of Covington, Georgia, Police Chief Stacey L. Cottton and others
Plaintiff:
London R. Bouvier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bouvier et al v. City of Covington, Georgia et al
as 1:2020cv03390
Plaintiff:
Romario A. Habib and London R. Bouvier
Defendant:
Piedmont Newton Hospital, Inc., Stacey L. Cotton, City of Covington, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP. D/B/A UNIVERSAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE, LLC
as 1:2017cv01732
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , WILLIAM DEMPSEY , RODERICK S. BASHIR and others
Defendant:
ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
