Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Paul Revere Transportation, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv10035
Plaintiff:
Conservation Law Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul Revere Transportation, LLC and Alternate Concepts, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02102
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Labor Relations Board v. Alternate Concepts, Inc.
as 3:2011mc00411
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Alternate Concepts, Inc.
National Labor Relations Board Region 24 v. Alternate Concepts, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01729
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board Region 24
Respondent:
Alternate Concepts Inc.
Cause Of Action: Administrative Subpoena
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Figueroa et al
as 3:2009cv01701
Plaintiff:
Ileana Figueroa, Jorge Leon and Noel G. Leon
Defendant:
Alternate Concepts, Inc., Alternate Concepts Business Trust, Autoridad de Carreteras y Transportacion de Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Metal Mulisha LLC et al v. Advanced Alternative Concepts Inc et al
as 5:2008cv01356
Defendant:
AAC Inc, Advanced Alternative Concepts Inc and Does
Counter Claimant:
Advanced Alternative Concepts Inc
Attorney Settlement Officer:
Attorney Settlement Officer
Counter Defendant:
Brian Deegan, Metal Mulisha LLC and Roes
Plaintiff:
MM Compound LLC and Metal Mulisha LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
