Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Singh v. Garland
as 22-6407
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Singh v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2021cv01425
Plaintiff: Amarjit Singh
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Rudy Lara
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329
Singh v. Barr
as 20-1993
Respondent: William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner: Amarjit Singh
Amarjit Singh v. USDC-CASD
as 19-70603
Not Classified By Court: In re: AMARJIT SINGH, GREGORY ARCHAMBEAULT, in his official capacity as San Diego Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES DOBSON, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant San Diego Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH
Singh v. Sessions
as 18-1502
Petitioner: Gurmit Singh, Amarjit Singh, AKA Gurmit Singh and Gurmit Singh
Respondent: Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Amarjit Singh v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-73450
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Amarjit Singh v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-70781
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Amarjit Singh v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-3042
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States
Singh v. Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-9541
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, United States Attorney General
Amarjit Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-73015
Petitioner: AMARJIT SINGH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?