Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Jiangxo Zhengao Recycled Textile Co., Ltd. v. Amazon.com Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03434
Petitioner:
Jiangxo Zhengao Recycled Textile Co., Ltd.
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services, LLC and Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 203 Jurisdiction; amount in controversy
Daniel Grant v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03141
Plaintiff:
Daniel Grant
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NLRB v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 24-1619
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Simon Haines v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Petitioner:
Simon Unsworth Haines
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Wanjuan Media (Tianjin) Co. LTD v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-899
Plaintiff:
WANJUAN MEDIA (TIANJIN) CO. LTD and Pilot Film And Television Media (Tianjin) Co., LTD.
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-5
Amazon.com Services LLC v. NLRB
as 24-1548
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
WAG Acquisition, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1633
Appellant:
WAG ACQUISITION, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
WAG Acquisition, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 24-1634
Appellant:
WAG ACQUISITION, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
AlmondNet, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 24-1427
Appellant:
ALMONDNET, INC.
Appellee:
META PLATFORMS, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
