Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Sloan (PS) v. Ambrose et al
as 1:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
John H. Sloan
Defendant:
Samuel P. Ambrose, Kiarra C. Jenkins, Alfonso K. Carrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dees (PS) et al v. Hood et al
as 1:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Dees and Ethan D. Smith
Defendant:
William Hood, Alexis King, Christopher Zenisek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Baker
as 24-4030
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MATTHEW AMBROSE BAKER
United States v. Baker
as 24-4019
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MATTHEW AMBROSE BAKER
Marker v. New Mexico House of Representatives et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Larry Marker
Respondent:
New Mexico House of Representatives, Eliseo Alcon, Anthony Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clark et al v. Stockton et al
as 5:2023cv01147
Plaintiff:
Jason Clark and Jenifer Clark
Defendant:
James Stockton, Teresa Stockton, Steve Ambrose and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States v. Baker
as 23-4099
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW AMBROSE BAKER
Clark et al v. Stockton et al
as 5:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jason Clark, Jenifer Clark, Kai Gilbert and others
Defendant:
James Stockton, Stockton & Associates INC, Stockton Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
The Trial Lawyers College v. Parris, et al
as 22-8052
Plaintiff:
THE TRIAL LAWYERS COLLEGE, a nonprofit corporation
Not Yet Classified:
JOHN JOYCE, GERALD L. SPENCE and REX PARRIS
Defendant:
GERRY SPENCES TRIAL LAWYERS COLLEGE AT THUNDERHEAD RANCH, a nonprofit corporation, JOHN ZELBST, JOSEPH H. LOW and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
