Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Alkhalili v. Piscitelli et al
as 4:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Anamilena Alkhalili
Defendant:
Louis Piscitelli, American Recovery Services, I.R. Services Property Redemption and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McCullers v. North American Recovery
as 3:2020cv03106
Defendant:
North American Recovery
Plaintiff:
Jamartin McCullers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Redevelopment Capital Partners, LLC et al v. North American Recovery Management, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03248
Plaintiff:
Spirit Funding, LLC and Redevelopment Capital Partners, LLC
Defendant:
North American Recovery Management, LLC, Robert Katz, Katahdin KI 50 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01223
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bernhard v. DeGrasse & Rolnick et al
as 4:2011cv01751
Plaintiff:
Dan Bernhard
Defendant:
DeGrasse & Rolnick and American Recovery Service Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Deas v. American Recovery Systems, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00078
Plaintiff:
James William Deas
Defendant:
American Recovery Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sessions v. American Recovery Systems, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00060
Plaintiff:
David Dwayne Sessions and David Dwayne Sessions
Defendant:
American Recovery Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
