Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Suess v. Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
as 6:2016cv00325
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Suess and Gary Suess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Colony Insurance Company v. Loughlin et al
as 1:2015cv03245
Plaintiff:
Colony Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sean Loughlin , Antonio Gonzalez , Kenneth Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv03146
Plaintiff:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation , Les Acree and Craig Williamson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
KONOPCA v. AMERISAVE MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 3:2015cv05339
Plaintiff:
JAN KONOPCA
Defendant:
AMERISAVE MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Loughlin v. Amerisave Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv03497
Plaintiff:
Sean Loughlin and Antonio Gonzalez
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation , Novo Appraisal Management Corporation and Patrick Markert
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2607
Jones v. Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2014cv22523
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Richard Jones
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Katz v. Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Robert Katz
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
O'Brien v. Amerisave Mortgage Corp. et al
as 8:2013cv01613
Plaintiff:
Ciaran O'Brien
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corp. and Michelle Compton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Wolffs et al v. Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2013cv00733
Plaintiff:
Howard Wolffs , Blain Rosenbery , Deborah Rau and others
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
Atkinson et al v. Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2013cv00720
Plaintiff:
Rodney Atkinson , Guy Lamura , Ha Le Dao and others
Defendant:
Amerisave Mortgage Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
