Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Young v. Sparks et al
as 7:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Larry Allen Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Joshua Sparks, Donald Hawkins, Thomas Waddy and others
Respondent:
Frank E. Dyer, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Sparks et al
as 3:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Larry Allen Young, Jr.
Defendant:
Joshua Sparks, Donald Hawkins, Thomas Waddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. Mills et al
as 2:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Amos Arroyo
Defendant:
Judge John Mills, Judge Jane Flythe, Shawn Overby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. Vergakis et al
as 2:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Amos Arroyo
Defendant:
John Vergakis, John Doe, John Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Amos Arroyo
Defendant:
John Doe, John Backaraff, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. Vergakis et al
as 2:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
Amos Arroyo
Defendant:
John Vergakis, Jane Murphy, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. Murphy
as 2:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Amos Arroyo
Defendant:
Captain Jane Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. Superintendant "John Doe" et al
as 2:2021cv00600
Plaintiff:
Amos J. Arroyo
Defendant:
Superintendant "John Doe", Hampton Roads Regional Jail and The City of Newport News
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacey v. Amos et al
as 1:2021cv00778
Defendant:
Jesse Amos and David Carny Todd
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arroyo v. Superintendent "John Doe" et al
as 2:2021cv00313
Plaintiff:
Amos Jacob Arroyo
Defendant:
Captain(s) "John Doe", NS Superintendant "John Doe", The City of Newport News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
