Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Edward Cromer v. Rick Snyder, et al
as 17-1502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES CROMER, In Sui Juris, Natural Person
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK SNYDER, Governor, BILL SCHUETTE, Attorney General, AMY BONITO, Parole Board Member and others
William Spencer v. Richard Snyder, et al
as 17-1449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SIM SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD SNYDER, Governor of Michigan, MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, MICHAEL EAGEN, Parole Board Chairman and others
Spencer v. Snyder et al
as 1:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
William Sim Spencer
Defendant:
Richard Snyder, Michigan Parole Board, Michael Eagen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cromer #211902 v. Snyder et al
as 1:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Edward James Cromer #211902
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Bill Schuette, Amy Bonito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Cromer v. USA, et al
as 16-2111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES CROMER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RICK SNYDER, BILL SCHUETTE and others
Cromer #211902 v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
Edward James Cromer #211902
Defendant:
United States of America, Rick Snyder, Bill Schuette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLong #265950 v. Hudechek et al
as 1:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
Gary Theodore DeLong #265950
Defendant:
Aaron Hudechek, Barbara Sampson and Amy Bonito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bi-State Compact Commission, Illinois/Michigan et al
as 2:2015cv14026
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Bi-State Compact Commission, Illinois/Michigan, Interstate Commission on Adult Offenders Supervision, Hagerman and others
Darrin LaPine v. Kenneth Romanowski, et al
as 15-1766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRIN LAPINE
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH ROMANOWSKI, Warden, SIDRA REDMOND, MICHAEL EAGEN and others
Spencer v. Gidley et al
as 2:2015cv11822
Petitioner:
William Sim Spencer
Respondent:
Laura Gidley, Kevin Belk, Amy Bonito and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
