Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Caruso v. Lamanna et al
as 6:2024cv06040
Plaintiff:
Ronald Caruso
Defendant:
Superintendent Amy Lamanna and Dr. Christopher Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Lamanna
as 9:2023cv00440
Petitioner:
Ali Muhammad
Respondent:
Amy Lamanna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wingate v. Porsch
as 23-405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Blake Wingate
Defendant / Appellee:
Barry Porsch, Esq., in individual and official capacities, Amy Lamanna, in individual and official capacities, Ted O'Brien and others
Baker v. Powell et al
as 7:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
Kristine Baker
Defendant:
Raldino Powell, Superintendent Eileen Russell, Ellen Gomprecht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rideout v. Lamanna
as 1:2022cv00969
Petitioner:
Laura Rideout
Respondent:
Amy Lamanna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony v. Rochester General Hospital et al
as 6:2022cv06372
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Anthony
Defendant:
Rochester General Hospital, Farhad Abtahian, MD, Jeremiah Depta, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gonzalez-Russell et al
as 1:2022cv07384
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMITH
Defendant:
Eileen Gonzalez-Russell, ELAINE VELEZ, Dr. Michelle Small and others
Interested Party:
New York State Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Lamanna
as 1:2022cv05804
Petitioner:
Daikwan Giles
Respondent:
Superintendent Amy Lamanna and Amy Lamanna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wingate v. Porsch et al
as 6:2022cv06277
Plaintiff:
Blake Wingate
Defendant:
Barry Porsch, Amy Lamanna, Ted O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Lamanna
as 22-711
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anna Adams
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Amy Lamanna
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
