Cases 1 - 9 of 9
iCare Child Development Center LLC et al v. Cicero-Brown et al
as 1:2024cv02291
Plaintiff:
iCare Child Development Center LLC and Lauren Davis
Defendant:
Alethea Cicero-Brown, Aleisha Golden, Amy M. Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis et al v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Lewis and Anthony Clay Lewis
Defendant:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company, Rocky Lee Pollard doing business as S.A.P. Trucking and Robert William Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Thompson, O'Brien, Kemp & Nasuti, P.C. v. Cleveland, P.C. et al
as 1:2020cv04994
Defendant:
Adam L. Cleveland, P.C., Amy M. Loiseau and Adam L. Cleveland
Plaintiff:
Thompson, O'Brien, Kemp & Nasuti, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Blochowicz v. Wilkie et al
as 1:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Joan Weber, Robert Wilkie, Michelle Cox-Henley and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Blochowicz and Jeffrey M. Blochowicz
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Brown v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv01356
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Amie M. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daker v. Carr et al
as 1:2018cv03297
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Law, Patricia Beth Attaway-Burton, Amy M. Radley and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Katiushka Rebeca Acosta-Smith et al v. Equifax Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01467
Plaintiff:
Katiushka Rebeca Acosta-Smith, Rebekah Leann Anderson, James Andrews and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hagan v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
Amy M Hagan
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
