Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv20781
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Peppers v. Armel et al
as 5:2019cv00327
Defendant:
Davis, Sapp, Pollocl and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Peppers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peppers v. Myers et al
as 3:2019cv00189
Defendant:
DHO Officer D. Huff, Amy Armel, Officer Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Peppers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Costello v. Dang, et al
as 1:2019cv00992
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, Connie Shelby, Iweb Visit and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Costello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christiansen v. Municipality of Adams County Combined Court Justice Center et al
as 1:2019cv00646
Respondent:
No Named Respondents
Plaintiff:
Steven Christiansen and Steven-Shiloi Christiansen
Defendant:
Municipality of Adams County Combined Court Justice Center, Treatment and Evaluations Services, Municipality of the State if the District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Cymeyon Hill v. Dang et al
as 2:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Dang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Wilson v. Robert Fox, et al
as 17-17091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, BRIAN DUFFY, Ex-Warden, D. HURLEY, Associate Warden and others
Van Dang v. Executive Director, Colo. Dep't Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00874
Petitioner:
Phuong Van Dang
Respondent:
Executive Director, Colo. Dep't Corrections and Cynthia H. Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Wilson v. Robert Fox, et al
as 16-16873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, BRIAN DUFFY, Ex-Warden, D. HURLEY, Associate Warden and others
Van Dang v. Colorado Health Partners et al
as 1:2016cv01231
Plaintiff:
Phuong Van Dang
Defendant:
Colorado Health Partners, Richard E. Hodge and Kathleen Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
