Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DI NARDO et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04338
Plaintiff:
DOMENIC DI NARDO and LUCILLE DI NARDO
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. AUTONEUM NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 4:2019cv00172
Defendant:
AUTONEUM AMERICA CORPORATION, FEILONG NONWOVEN MACHINERY CO., LTD, AUTONEUM NORTH AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dies v. USA
as 1:2013cv00269
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Charles Dies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dies v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00265
Petitioner:
Charles Dies
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY v. RO-DI OIL COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2013mc00019
Plaintiff:
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY
Defendant:
RO-DI OIL COMPANY, INC.
Dies v. USA
as 1:2012cv00105
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Charles Dies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dies v. Fries et al
as 1:2010cv00216
Plaintiff:
Charles Dies
Defendant:
Kenneth Fries, Harbor and Pruden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. DI CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00954
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DI CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., DIMENSIONS, INC., DI, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
LADY DI'S, INC. v. ENCHANCED SERVICES BILLING, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00340
Plaintiff:
LADY DI'S, INC., LADY DI'S, INC., LADY DI'S, INC. and others
Defendant:
ENCHANCED SERVICES BILLING, INC., ENCHANCED SERVICES BILLING, INC. and ILD TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
