Cases 1 - 9 of 9
VERMA v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01330
Plaintiff:
ANAND VERMA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANAND et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv01635
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
NEIL ANAND and LESLY POMPY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BANKERS STANDARD INSURANCE CO. et al v. ANAND et al
as 1:2019cv01661
Plaintiff:
BANKERS STANDARD INSURANCE CO., PACIFIC INDEMNITY CO. and GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE CO.
Defendant:
ASHA ANAND and VINOD ANAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DINGLER et al v. HATTEN et al
as 1:2017cv02232
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DINGLER and ASHTON DINGLER
Defendant:
JAMES N. HATTEN, JUSTIN S. ANAND, AMY TOTTENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DINGLER et al v. HATTEN et al
as 1:2017cv02200
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DINGLER and ASHTON DINGLER
Defendant:
JAMES N. HATTEN, JUSTIN S. ANAND, AMY TOTTENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
NATIONAL VENTURE CAPITAL ASSOCIATION et al v. DUKE et al
as 1:2017cv01912
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL VENTURE CAPITAL ASSOCIATION , ATMA KRISHNA , ANAND KRISHNA and others
Defendant:
ELAINE DUKE , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , JAMES MCCAMENT and others
Amicu:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
SRINIVASAN v. RICE et al
as 1:2007cv02299
Plaintiff:
ANAND SRINIVASAN
Defendant:
CONDOLEEZZA RICE, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
