Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 503
Albert Pickett, Jr., et al v. City of Cleveland, OH
as 24-3395
Plaintiff: ALBERT PICKETT, JR., KEYONNA JOHNSON, JAROME MONTGOMERY and others
Defendant: CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH
Amicus Curiae: NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
Naythan Ward, et al v. J.M. Smucker Company
as 24-3387
Plaintiff: NAYTHAN A. WARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOE PISCIOTTI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CAMERON BOPP, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: J.M. SMUCKER COMPANY
Naythan Ward, et al v. J.M. Smucker Company
as 24-3386
Plaintiff: NAYTHAN A. WARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JOE PISCIOTTI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CAMERON BOPP, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: J.M. SMUCKER COMPANY
Jessica Clippinger v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company
as 24-5421
Plaintiff: JESSICA CLIPPINGER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant: STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Attica Scott, et alIn re: Attica Scott, et al
as 24-501
Petitioner: In re: ATTICA SCOTT, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, CORBIN SMITH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, KAYLA MEISNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Respondent: LOUISVILLE-JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY METRO GOVERNMENT, GREG FISCHER, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of Louisville, KY, ROBERT SCHROEDER, individually and in his official capacity as Interim Chief of the Louisville Metropolitan Police Department and others
Knox et al v. Tee Jaye's Country Place, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01593
Plaintiff: Tandy J Knox, Megan Drake, Macie R Jenkins and others
Defendant: Tee Jaye's Country Place, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jon Kean v. Stott, et al
as 24-1209
Plaintiff: JON PAUL KEAN
Defendant: CORRECTIONS OFFICER STOTT, personal and official capacity, CORRECTIONS OFFICER OLSON, personal and official capacity, CORRECTIONS OFFICER GODELL, personal and official capacity and others
Bunch v. Caterpillar Logistics Inc.
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff: Michael R Bunch, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Michael R Bunch
Defendant: Caterpillar Logistics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
J. B. v. Sandra Harwood
as 24-3024
Plaintiff: J. B., a minor, by her father and next friend and all others similarly situated
Defendant: HONORABLE SANDRA STABILE HARWOOD, in her official capacity as the Administrative Judge of the Trumbull County Common Pleas Court, Juvenile Division
Daretha Braziel, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 23-1954
Plaintiff / Appellee: DARETHA BRAZIEL, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of RB, next friend of DB, next friend of DR, KEESHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan, next friend of KJ, next friend of DJ, next friend of TC, next friend of KB, IEASHA JONES, individually and on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Plaintiff Residents of the City of Benton Harbor, Michigan and others
Defendant: GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, iindividually and in her official capacity, STATE OF MICHIGAN, Environment, Great Lakes & Energy, LIESL CLARK, Director, individually and in her official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant: MARCUS MUHAMMAD, Mayor, individually and in his official capacity, MICHAEL O'MALLEY, Water Plant Operator, individually and in his official capacity and CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, a Municipal Corporation, through the Benton Harbor Water Department

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?