Cases 1 - 10 of 185
ANDERSON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
LLOYD ANDERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00701
Petitioner:
DARRYL LINEAR ANDERSON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
DEJAUNE L. ANDERSON and PRINCESS CALIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
CAROLYN ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00405
Petitioner:
TODD ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DEAMUS v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
MORANY DEAMUS
Defendant:
JAMIE ANDERSON, M. KIERSZNOWSKI and REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Miami Correctional Facility
as 3:2023cv01058
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility and MCF
Plaintiff:
Nathan Anderson and Nathan A Anderson
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittenburg v. Lake County Facility et al
as 2:2023cv00413
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Lake County Facility, Correctional Officer, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WEISNER
as 1:2023cv02109
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ANDERSON
Defendant:
CINDY WEISNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
