Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McDavid v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Logan McDavid
Respondent:
Anderson County, TN and Anderson County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bunch v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2020mc00055
Defendant:
Anderson County, TN and Southern Health Partners
Plaintiff:
Ronald N Bunch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jett v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Anderson County, TN, Ridgeview Mental Health Services and James Landry
Plaintiff:
Christopher Logan Jett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Anderson County, TN et al (PSLC2)
as 3:2020cv00338
Defendant:
Sgt Robertson, Deputy Parten, Corp Morris and others
Plaintiff:
James D Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Anderson County, TN, State of Tennessee, Southern Health Partners and others
Plaintiff:
Devin D Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harness v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Anderson County, TN, State of Tennessee, Southern Health Partners and others
Plaintiff:
Erman L Harness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Anderson County, TN, State of Tennessee, Southern Health Partners and others
Plaintiff:
James D Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton et al v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2019cv00441
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Southern Health Partners and Anderson County, TN
Plaintiff:
Erman L Harness, Devin D Brown, James D Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braden v. Stuart et al
as 3:2019cv00323
Defendant:
Criminal Court of the 7th Judicial District of TN, David A. Stuart, Anderson County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Robert Braden, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
